By the end of the month, the U.S. National Security Agency and the FBI will likely have more than 50,000 people working in their cybercrime division, or IC.
That’s about a third of the nation’s workforce.
While the IC is expected to grow, it will only account for about a quarter of the entire federal government’s cybercrime budget.
As it has for years, the IC will work on behalf of the federal government, targeting businesses that are not part of its core mission, like the Department of Defense and the federal intelligence agencies.
The IC will have no oversight from Congress.
Its budget will not even be audited by Congress.
The agency has not released the names of the people it is targeting.
It has not revealed what it is using its ICs to do.
Nor has it disclosed how many Americans it has targeted or the types of crimes they have committed.
And it has not given any indication how many times it has tried to use the ICs on a single case.
A spokesperson for the Department, which runs the IC, said that its cybercrime team has the authority to collect, use and disseminate cyber threat data.
But she declined to say how many of those cases were successful.
She also said the IC did not track the identities of individuals targeted by the IC.
The IC has become a key part of the Department’s response to cyberthreats and data breaches.
The agency has deployed its own teams to conduct data analysis and investigate attacks on government agencies and other targets, including banks and other financial institutions.
The team also helps investigate cyberattacks on private companies and individuals, and it has been responsible for finding, prosecuting and punishing cybercriminals.
The intelligence community, which includes the FBI and the CIA, has the power to use ICs, but it has declined to do so.
Its ICs have not been used to investigate cybercriments.
The National Security Council said in a statement to TechRadars that it “has always been the case that the IC works on behalf the Department and is not a target of the Intelligence Community.”
The council did not address whether the IC targets private companies, though it has told lawmakers that the agency does not target private companies.
The NSA has been using the IC since 2013, when it launched the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, to provide a more centralized and secure system for sharing information.
The law allows the IC to share cyberthreat information with law enforcement, intelligence agencies and others without a court order, though the IC says it cannot share with private companies without a warrant.
The cybercrime agency’s work in the U, where its mission has shifted to focus on the world’s most dangerous cyberthreat, has created concern among cybersecurity experts and industry groups.
The government has spent billions of dollars to beef up its IC.
A recent study by the Government Accountability Office found that the NSA spent $8.8 billion on its IC program in the 12 months before President Donald Trump took office.
But some experts say that despite the IC’s recent moves, the government has failed to provide sufficient oversight.
In a recent report on the IC by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, an industry group, the authors said the government “has failed to identify and address its IC workforce needs and is failing to adequately support the IC through the implementation of the CISPA legislation.”
The GAO report noted that the government’s IC is in the midst of its third round of budget cuts that it will not be able to implement.
The GAO added that it is unclear whether Congress will pass any legislation to restore the IC and if it will make its budget more transparent.
“While the government is required to fund the IC in the next fiscal year, Congress should not allow the IC workforce to be reduced, or the government to be deprived of critical resources,” the report said.
The House of Representatives is set to vote this week on CISPA.
The Senate has passed CISPA in its current form, but has not taken up the legislation.